From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pierre.weis@inria.fr>
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B026CBC88
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed,  9 Feb 2005 01:17:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j190H1TD002581
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 01:17:01 +0100
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA13399 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 01:17:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j190H0EX027095
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 01:17:00 +0100
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so985040wra
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:16:56 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=OmMnPJjXDgZrdGwgnAhT4uVT7J9qOowqZvTWC6x/WovrTlEaKtmydrRMJ65AOJu59U3egt6b8jGq7Sf37xfDtySCmANYn1FONIf8VYtnpYU+0IUVOd7AS6Ftss8m47fV3HB/aZ6GOzjQht2b7XFDkD8Z0srGJirCAsd+eincCM4=
Received: by 10.54.41.64 with SMTP id o64mr125345wro;
        Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.22.12 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <d849ad2a0502081616326ef5b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:16:56 -0500
From: John Prevost <j.prevost@gmail.com>
Reply-To: John Prevost <j.prevost@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unquantifiable escaping type in variation of visitor pattern
In-Reply-To: <20050208225542.GA20967@anthony.ics.uci.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20050208225542.GA20967@anthony.ics.uci.edu>
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4209567D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4209567C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; prevost:01 prevost:01 caml-list:01 escaping:01 compile:01 hmm:01 encoding:02 objects:02 objects:02 pattern:03 pattern:03 concrete:05 performs:05 variation:06 i'm:08 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level: 

Hmm.  Would it be possible to include a more complete example (even if
it doesn't compile)--that is, one where the visitor actually performs
real work?  My suspicion is that you would be better off *not*
encoding this visitor pattern using objects, but since I'm not clear
on how you intend to use it, I can't give a concrete example.  (And
likewise even if objects are the best choice.)

John.