caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Hickey <jasonh@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The new OCaml book (Objective Caml Programming  Language by Tim Rentsch)
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:57:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d86ee07e0903041857n5fd9dbd9uaed7e1b4cb44c2ac@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090304080626.GA19682@usha.takhisis.invalid>

To the OCaml community,

I apologize for my silence.  I have very strong feelings for this
community.  I have benefited quite profoundly from Caml (starting when
I first wrote Metaprl in caml-light), and I wish to continue my role
as an advocate, supporter, and instructor.  Before I can say anything,
I think it is important to wait until I have seen a copy of the text.
Amazon promises me it will arrive by Friday, so we shall see.

For now, let me just mention that there is considerable documentation
available online if one wishes to assess the history/pedigree of the
text.  The course sites point to various versions of the book, usually
under the "Resources" section for Caltech CS134b.  Here is an early
version of the text I used in 2002.

   http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~jyh/classes/cs134/cs134b/2002/book.pdf

Initially I wrote the book in Metaprl, then I later switched to LaTeX,
so there are a couple of separate subversion repositories (use "svn ls
<link>" and similar commands).

December 2000 -- April 2006:
   http://svn.metaprl.org/svnroot/mojave/metaprl/theories/ocaml_doc@9228
April 2006 -- Jan 2007:
   http://svn.metaprl.org/svnroot/papers/trunk/ocaml_book

subversion stats:
   jyh: 267 revisions, lines added/removed: +293342, -216176
   nogin: 29 revisions, lines: +16441, -12339
   txr: 36 revisions, lines: +13958, -4536
(nogin is Aleksey Nogin, a post-doc and good friend; his changes were technical)

In Jan 2007, I had the dispute with Mr. Rentsch where I thought his
claims were overly grandiose, and I rolled back the text to 2003 and
started over.

   http://svn.metaprl.org/svnroot/papers/trunk/ocaml_book

The current text is submitted and ready for publication since Jan
2008, but it has been delayed.  Mr. Rentsch made a formal request to
CUP to review the manuscript.  We sent him a copy in Jan 2008; he
acknowledged receipt, but the status has been in limbo while we await
his review.  I now believe that this may have been a delaying
tactic...

It is a bit ironic that Mr. Rentsch did not extend me the same
courtesy, so that now I must be silent until Amazon fulfills my order!
 It is difficult to be silent, I feel a great deal of fear, but it
cannot yet be grounded.  We shall see.

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-05  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-02 16:21 Tim Rentsch
2009-03-02 18:06 ` Alexy Khrabrov
2009-03-02 18:37   ` Xavier Leroy
2009-03-03  1:29     ` Jon Harrop
2009-03-04  7:58     ` Tim Rentsch
2009-03-04  6:59   ` Tim Rentsch
2009-03-04  8:06     ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-03-05  2:57       ` Jason Hickey [this message]
2009-03-05  3:17         ` Jason Hickey
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-04 13:39 Ed Keith
2009-02-28 17:17 Tim Rentsch
2009-02-27 12:27 Richard Jones
2009-02-27 12:29 ` [Caml-list] " Richard Jones
2009-02-27 14:28 ` Tom Hutchinson
2009-02-27 19:40   ` Jon Harrop
2009-02-27 20:22     ` Jason Hickey
2009-02-27 21:34       ` Jon Harrop
2009-02-27 21:48         ` Dario Teixeira
2009-02-28 14:19         ` Jon Harrop
2009-02-27 23:34       ` Richard Jones
2009-02-28 17:52       ` Tim Rentsch
2009-02-27 17:37 ` Nathaniel Gray
2009-02-27 17:42   ` Richard Jones
     [not found]     ` <aee06c9e0902271043g419a0581mf17430b55a695f2b@mail.gmail.com>
2009-02-27 18:45       ` Nathaniel Gray
2009-02-27 18:52         ` William Neumann
2009-02-27 20:06           ` Jon Harrop
2009-02-27 23:29           ` Richard Jones
2009-02-27 17:46   ` Alexy Khrabrov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d86ee07e0903041857n5fd9dbd9uaed7e1b4cb44c2ac@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jasonh@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).