There would be high overhead because I would be passing very large data sets back and forth. And I thought a binding would be easier to use. Printing/parsing becomes tedious. On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Francois Rouaix wrote: > And why do you need bindings instead of simply feeding generated source > code to the R toplevel?Low-level bindings are mostly useful if the calls > go both ways or if the parsing costs represent a high overhead. > --f > > > 2008/3/15 Ashish Agarwal : > > I searched a few weeks ago for this but did not find anything. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Maxence Guesdon < > > maxence.guesdon@inria.fr> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Has anyone developed any kind of bindings with R-project to call R > > > from OCaml programs ? If so, is it available somewhere ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Maxence Guesdon > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > > > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > > > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > > > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > > > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > > > >