From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FC7BBAF for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:31:00 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmIBAEHtJ0lIDtyYkGdsb2JhbACCQDCQLz4BAQEBCQkMBxEDsgyBAosMAQMBA4J5 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,650,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="31725162" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2008 20:31:00 +0100 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id mAMJV0Cw021900 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:31:00 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmIBAEHtJ0lIDtyYkGdsb2JhbACCQDCQLz4BAQEBCQkMBxEDsgyBAosMAQMBA4J5 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,650,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="31725161" Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2008 20:30:59 +0100 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so1126164fga.25 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:30:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=IjsSPEbbAnQP4jETsQOsPVHDoMJpmSASEubw3up2B2g=; b=FIc1/t/+0hk9c8gQyAE/JYdRdpIT964iyCddsaTv8qzQ3mzr4qyucjM0HrGT3vi2j/ C+pzEEEF16fJ5zeAs2GLzttvt4l7fuYTA62sbzSUFXoaIwTA4ObuefysmD1QLBU3l+t9 G93PVgJZfwR9jukB8xm5qlA6xeG0QuvRuMTM4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=bYh5Djk6dj2PnNtAAAs2WWlmdBFbIEXCyXDXZYe7mtEMqE/qiZFoy1tVsfNSFPotyh kd2tSaUwdg6WN8ZXZwEkvL+59sGojYUKSogOj/rkRyLeBu6yKlPPY1FZUMfbkMSfdd8n ZMCp4+jWp+qRpZB1beCM67P6RrfLlHDjfFO88= Received: by 10.86.94.11 with SMTP id r11mr1320734fgb.11.1227382259270; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:30:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.79.18 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:30:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:30:59 -0500 From: "Ashish Agarwal" To: "Caml List" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About namespaces In-Reply-To: <1227216556.7676.31.camel@Blefuscu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21953_19289677.1227382259260" References: <1227216556.7676.31.camel@Blefuscu> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 49285DF4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; namespaces:01 mylist:01 merging:01 mylist:01 merging:01 1975:98 caml-list:01 writes:01 writes:01 define:02 define:02 external:03 external:03 module:03 module:03 ------=_Part_21953_19289677.1227382259260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > Among other things, this means that if I write an extension MyList to > List and someone else writes and extension HisList to List, there is no > automated way to merge these, I need to write yet another module > LatestList to be able to use both extensions at the same time. Merging these with the import command you propose requires an external configuration. Would that be any easier than using include to define a new module? Or is there supposed to be some other benefit I'm missing? ------=_Part_21953_19289677.1227382259260 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Among other things, this means that if I write an extension MyList to
List and someone else writes and extension HisList to List, there is no
automated way to merge these, I need to write yet another module
LatestList to be able to use both extensions at the same time.

Merging these with the import command you propose requires an external configuration. Would that be any easier than using include to define a new module? Or is there supposed to be some other benefit I'm missing?


------=_Part_21953_19289677.1227382259260--