From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jean.krivine@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0803CBBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu,  4 Jun 2009 20:02:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuECALuoJ0rRVdrPmGdsb2JhbACXYD8BAQEBAQgJDAcRpV6BFZBRAQMCBIQHBQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,306,1241388000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="28850680"
Received: from mail-bw0-f207.google.com ([209.85.218.207])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2009 20:02:28 +0200
Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so992365bwz.27
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=pJME/q+FGSH3l3jw/hteGBSGC1Sr4i9etE7aeN2XiUI=;
        b=aPRA1o2l4HxLOB7u9ovirAsbQSuNDN3pj6Q4QwS/6IxLGgpnOPqYck5Yc/+LvnVSfV
         se1ywAQ+JYfy8j60EvS0yPobJvDAlH5TrHDiN9wAR9OduT7bV2S/MJBcZsVZ8nH72cuU
         AE45lE2ePetujGKzufpatdVceGmIkveLLLEoU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ECIueeksbgHAJVpGsgwflxr1Tgt8WUaA6+4EqSNFBPCRDCyTqdNheACESsXgHwae1e
         5XMQ36kKib+C337OVzj2W7EZcGm6RP5MATYqDtAsUlyX9Aj3AdZ3hINXevAGmyvSljUO
         zGzqypNS7j9ofzvecS4/WCIA/utKwzvR4oQ88=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.56.4 with SMTP id w4mr2300280bkg.17.1244138548004; Thu, 04 
	Jun 2009 11:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3d13dcfc0906041029s2d37837ei8f6735b4cc29aecb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dc2907b70906041003pae47426r6ba865ef536aeaf5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3d13dcfc0906041029s2d37837ei8f6735b4cc29aecb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:02:27 -0400
Message-ID: <dc2907b70906041102x4272cb74gc0d018a5728ea06b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Garbage collection and profiling
From: Jean Krivine <jean.krivine@gmail.com>
To: David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; krivine:01 krivine:01 ocaml:01 2009:98 2009:98 garbage:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 graph:01 caml-list:01 output:02 native:03 gprof:03 profiling:04 profiling:04 

For some strange reasons when I do so, I don't have time% but only
call numbers in the profile. Is there something I missed?

J

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:29 PM, David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 19:03, Jean Krivine <jean.krivine@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Does anyone knows a simple way to evaluate the time spent by an ocaml
>> program in GCing?
>
> Activate profiling in native code version and sum the time spent in
> the GC entry points in gprof call graph output?
>
> Sincerely yours,
> david
>