From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C780BBB81 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 10:52:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j998qHvS017551 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 10:52:17 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA00956 for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 10:52:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j998qFPE009614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 10:52:16 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EOWtU-00020E-P0 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:50:56 +0200 Received: from host113-164.pool8249.interbusiness.it ([82.49.164.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:50:56 +0200 Received: from vincenzo_yahoo_addressguard-gmane by host113-164.pool8249.interbusiness.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:50:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Vincenzo Ciancia Subject: Re: Ray tracer language comparison Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:53:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200510040018.24932.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host113-164.pool8249.interbusiness.it User-Agent: KNode/0.9.2 Sender: news X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4348DA41.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4348DA3F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 attenzione:98 l'indirizzo:98 posta:98 nel:98 campo:98 wrote:01 caml:02 objective:02 benchmark:02 benchmark:02 comparison:03 comparison:03 somewhat:05 quite:06 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 Thomas Fischbacher wrote: > > As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally > was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation > with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his > methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute > another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison. What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml" and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at all :) V. -- Please note that I do not read the e-mail address used in the from field but I read vincenzo_ml at yahoo dot it Attenzione: non leggo l'indirizzo di posta usato nel campo from, ma leggo vincenzo_ml at yahoo dot it