From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 523FE7EF5E for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:42:05 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:aDyLBBwSL3DiEAzXCy+O+j09IxM/srCxBDY+r6Qd0e4VIJqq85mqBkHD//Il1AaPBtSDra4YwLeN+4nbGkU4qa6bt34DdJEeHzQksu4x2zIaPcieFEfgJ+TrZSFpVO5LVVti4m3peRMNQJW2WVTerzWI4CIIHV2nbEwud7yzRtKZ0p///tvx0qWbWx9Piju5bOE6BzSNhiKViPMrh5B/IL060BrDrygAUe1XwWR1OQDbxE6ktY/jtKJkph9o86Y67+ZHS6/7Y608Q7tISj8hNjZmytfssEzvRBGO4TMgX2QGnxtSCkCR4BjgX5C3rib7pud8wiCyO8n7XKw5X3Kp6KI9G0ygszsOKzNsqDKfscd3lq8O+B8= Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=dario.teixeira@nleyten.com; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=dario.teixeira@nleyten.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@relay4-d.mail.gandi.net Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) identity=pra; client-ip=217.70.183.196; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-sender="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=217.70.183.196; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-sender="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@relay4-d.mail.gandi.net) identity=helo; client-ip=217.70.183.196; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dario.teixeira@nleyten.com"; x-sender="postmaster@relay4-d.mail.gandi.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DRAADA54hXh8S3RtlchRa6aIYaAoEsOxEBAQEBAQEBAREBAQEIDQkJIS+CMhWCFgEEATgCPwULBAdGVwYbiCAMwAMBAQEHAQEBASOGKoRNihsFmSGBXox2gVwBFYRZiHGQGQI0gjyBWIZBfwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0DRAADA54hXh8S3RtlchRa6aIYaAoEsOxEBAQEBAQEBAREBAQEIDQkJIS+CMhWCFgEEATgCPwULBAdGVwYbiCAMwAMBAQEHAQEBASOGKoRNihsFmSGBXox2gVwBFYRZiHGQGQI0gjyBWIZBfwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,368,1464645600"; d="scan'208";a="226808823" Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jul 2016 15:42:04 +0200 Received: from mfilter44-d.gandi.net (mfilter44-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.175]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8901A1720BF; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:42:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter44-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.196]) by mfilter44-d.gandi.net (mfilter44-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qbc2FyJGFr2k; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:42:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 10.58.1.141 Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail1-d.mgt.gandi.net [10.58.1.141]) (Authenticated sender: dario.teixeira@nleyten.com) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DB66E1720A5; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:42:02 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:42:02 +0100 From: Dario Teixeira To: SP Cc: caml-list In-Reply-To: <20160715113708.GF5091@tiger> References: <9ab1f1de347c6531e51d0757e140a49c@nleyten.com> <20160715113708.GF5091@tiger> Message-ID: X-Sender: dario.teixeira@nleyten.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ZeroMQ vs Nanomsg Hi, > What I'm curious about is how interoperable they are. Can one switch > between the two back-ends or bindings? Does either of them "wrap" the > other? Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but my impression is that there's no interoperability at all between ZeroMQ and Nanomsg. Cheers, Dario