On 3/13/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">&quot;Sayan (Sébastien Li-Thiao-Té)&quot;</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:sayan@crans.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">sayan@crans.org</a>&gt; wrote:
<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I have already tried to be GC-friendly, and use the &quot;standard&quot; way to do<br>things.</blockquote><div><br>
Well, you shouldn't expect the GC to become more friendly towards you when you become less friendly towards the GC ;-)<br>
</div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">For example the following function also works using a 32-bit<br>chroot, but also fails with the 64-bit compiler. The question is : why
<br>does it fail with the 64-bit compiler?</blockquote><div><br>
Obviously because of a bug: the allocation functions return negative
values on 64-bit machines.&nbsp; You should submit a bug report here:
<a href="http://www.ocaml.org/mantis">http://www.ocaml.org/mantis</a><br>
</div></div><br>
Regards,<br>
Markus<br>
<br>-- <br>Markus
Mottl&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ocaml.info" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://www.ocaml.info</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="mailto:markus.mottl@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
markus.mottl@gmail.com</a>