From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A2DBB81 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:24:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k2MIOR1r010043 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:24:28 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA22065 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:24:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k2MIOQwc000865 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:24:27 +0100 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s10so167297wxc for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:24:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=CBt0u+DVPIS8uKdRhV5wX/khtxfhSztHC/9yHIQ0yx2BXCO21IewzKbOsFv+1I5EpoyY0LHcazvRYN2fWra7keyk1g2Zl9AEW7HCF27hf8edRx+R8DBhHkInWjsk8Blwz3JKz/49j7ilz8TjxLl0ZtWadToeGJUXDjlw3ELfAJY= Received: by 10.70.40.13 with SMTP id n13mr1342465wxn; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:24:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.57.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:24:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:24:26 -0500 From: "Markus Mottl" To: ocaml Subject: CVS-release309 production-ready? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6822_30858550.1143051866080" X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4421965C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4421965A.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; markus:01 mottl:01 markus:01 mottl:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 bug:01 cvs:01 ocaml:01 cvs:01 W8:98 W8:98 patches:02 patches:02 fixes:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, INFO_TLD,RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 ------=_Part_6822_30858550.1143051866080 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I'd like to know whether the current CVS-release of OCaml with tag release309, which contains two recent bug fixes that are important to us (I/O and signals related), is considered safe by INRIA for production use. The patches for the two bug fixes seem correct to me, but there are a coupl= e of other changes (e.g. in code generation, etc.) about which I don't know much about. Are these other patches still going to see more testing before official release? If not, we could as well use the current state of CVS rather than having t= o extract the two mentioned patches, especially if most of the other patches were mostly bug fixes, too. Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com ------=_Part_6822_30858550.1143051866080 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

I'd like to know whether the current CVS-release of OCaml with tag release309, which contains two recent bug fixes that are important to us (I/O and signals related), is considered safe by INRIA for production use.  The patches for the two bug fixes seem correct to me, but there are a couple of other changes (e.g. in code generation, etc.) about which I don't know much about.  Are these other patches still going to see more testing before official release?

 If not, we could as well use the current state of CVS rather than having to extract the two mentioned patches, especially if most of the other patches were mostly bug fixes, too.

Regards,
Markus

--
Markus Mottl        http://www.ocaml.info      &n= bsp; markus.mottl@gmail.com<= /a> ------=_Part_6822_30858550.1143051866080--