From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B85CBB84 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:10:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4GFAN21019282 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:10:23 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA29346 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:10:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.207]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k4GFAM17019278 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:10:22 +0200 Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t12so346584wxc for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=aXLmwv24iHdcgP6tyQWWJ1hnRqToU0+Ixfmk3tdrC8/PhgzwljV6EjFrXJkLpfVzMRB+GfLjXXVnMdEEGtwk4BgqIFiasrrC1Myg+8ziSzZnyzt82jExQHJ1sh9O4zyTnABiJ5NHh2VVv/4gFHGWM8i6mxP/l3qV+MsXs8pu6H8= Received: by 10.70.19.9 with SMTP id 9mr144677wxs; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.55.17 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:10:22 -0400 From: "Markus Mottl" To: "Damien Doligez" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Array 4 MB size limit Cc: "caml users" In-Reply-To: <9084E812-A51A-499D-A99C-D6841F717F0C@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30899_14638834.1147792222108" References: <20060515141230.ajyupn2z28k0484s@horde.akalin.cx> <9084E812-A51A-499D-A99C-D6841F717F0C@inria.fr> X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4469EB5E.001 on nez-perce : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4469EB5F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4469EB5E.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; markus:01 mottl:01 markus:01 mottl:01 damien:01 damien:01 doubles:01 arrays:01 ocaml:01 doubles:01 arrays:01 ocaml:01 W8:98 W8:98 wrote:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, INFO_TLD,RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 ------=_Part_30899_14638834.1147792222108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 5/16/06, Damien Doligez wrote: > > > When you move to 64 bits, the tag word doubles in size, but the > > amount of "other" information in the tag word doesn't- this means > > that suddenly you have 52 bits of size, or 4T arrays. > > This is not quite correct, but a mere factor of 1000 doesn't matter > much at > this point :-) > And 640KB ought to be enough for anyone ;-) Regards, Markus --=20 Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com ------=_Part_30899_14638834.1147792222108 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 5/16/06, Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr> wrote:
> When you move to 64 bits, the tag word doubles in size, but the
>= ; amount of "other" information in the tag word doesn't- this mea= ns
> that suddenly you have 52 bits of size, or 4T arrays.

This is not quite correct, but a mere factor of 1000 doesn't matter
much= at
this point :-)

And 640KB= ought to be enough for anyone ;-)

Regards,
Markus

--
Markus Mottl       &nb= sp;http://www.ocaml.info  &= nbsp;     markus.mottl@gmail.com ------=_Part_30899_14638834.1147792222108--