From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6894EBC69 for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 22:31:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.180]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l43KVcu3005079 for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 22:31:39 +0200 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c29so614718ika for ; Thu, 03 May 2007 13:31:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IVsZhSEThTTBvhKPeKa9LnI0cz+LwzQ3H9KZfuqFlc0gu/AObFg4WpcSCChbR3hN0OhRAG31XI1pkKHRWlag4j0Vw2OcDfUTvwEq4lpJIKmwDU7e4oa9F8Xsyex7FbuPCuz0QnxUyVGHi/8O9Pw07rPorMCt6QAs0H3C15YQuJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kPDw2PN49UFhA0BOPTpiyzGSFid+YiK76r106ym24iGAzxdYA8UN2GFig7KfmHsLtVVLCKnsPX+At1c7LM/akB+z839iTBv2jaf5Eey9FnyWWMoZpp4pOBMF1pVQ9hMDgq84L/0fkfFRmTtL//1NoA+gnEcQ6WB0MlRW34IKenw= Received: by 10.78.123.4 with SMTP id v4mr1154422huc.1178224298535; Thu, 03 May 2007 13:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.21.20 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2007 13:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 16:31:38 -0400 From: "Markus Mottl" To: OCaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Inlining and code placement In-Reply-To: <20070503202932.GB12369@nyc-qws-003.delacy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070503202932.GB12369@nyc-qws-003.delacy.com> X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 463A46AB.000 on discorde : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 0.000 -> 1 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 463A46AB.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; markus:01 mottl:01 markus:01 mottl:01 inlining:01 inlining:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 strong:96 seems:03 differences:05 likely:08 alias:09 On 5/3/07, mmottl@janestcapital.com wrote: > concerning my email about inlining from a few days ago: it seems that > the majority of differences is not so much due to the inlining level but > due to code placement. This means that playing with the inlining level > beyond some reasonable, small value is likely to not have any strong > impact on the performance of the program. (Sorry, this went to the wrong alias, it wasn't intended for the OCaml mailining list - but isn't that much off topic either ;). Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com