From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2024BC69 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 07:05:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.188]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7255hw7026908 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 07:05:44 +0200 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so309651rvb for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:05:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HC2yIpEbW7bi83AzxmVcoRTmmYehTKgK0MvKl/sLidu/KPBgXOtcKmYg2BEyeL0AYddjJduHAjbPBfoUJRUQzqLdo8C11QWbd0P6PgqjrhMhUV0jyTBbgBqWgrKnrvxAOunl+gy+gJBJeDCQ1Wcpj5o49EuMjfVoJTmpbJTShY0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FBXRhVSzMDDkcq4owwyzKgZOuzvxvwQ5MW6dedITwFtJMFCY+lGezrA6ddecSeHhKCal2geL3lzn97cutHo9H+WlbguJSuIiFSogqwCYevuszbzZXuctX0Rkc1MUmpdVDyreMclw4VF1NMoAIDGzWuAj03wDXW+owJ5fui/uADY= Received: by 10.142.252.11 with SMTP id z11mr70530wfh.1186031143068; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.255.12 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 22:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 01:05:43 -0400 From: "Markus Mottl" To: "Andres Varon" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] segfault in 3.10.0 Cc: "OCaml List" In-Reply-To: <7209A0C0-93DC-46A9-940D-47C54EB31E1B@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7209A0C0-93DC-46A9-940D-47C54EB31E1B@gmail.com> X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 46B16627.001 on discorde : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 0.000 -> 1 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46B16627.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; markus:01 mottl:01 markus:01 mottl:01 segfault:01 segfaults:01 ocaml:01 segfaults:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 stack:01 stack:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 native:03 On 8/1/07, Andres Varon wrote: > Has anyone observed sudden segfaults in OCaml 3.10.0 amd-64 under > linux? I would almost bet it's that one: http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4300 Avoid enabling native stack backtraces (i.e. don't set OCAMLRUNPARAM=b=1). I haven't seen any segfaults yet unless these were turned on in which case you may see them often. Native stack backtraces unfortunately seem still broken. Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com