* Re: Ocaml Win64 build?
[not found] <caee5ad80509180700433f1024@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2005-09-22 12:41 ` Xavier Leroy
2005-09-27 9:29 ` [Caml-list] " Dmitry Bely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Xavier Leroy @ 2005-09-22 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mikkelfj; +Cc: caml-list
[ The question was asked on caml-list a while ago, and I forgot to
reply there, so this is Cc: to caml-list ]
> Do you have any plans to release Ocaml in an x86_64 bit version for Windows?
> Or a 32-bit version that can also generate 64-bit binaries? In fact,
> this would be preferable to having a 64-bit version that cannot
> generate 32-bit binaries.
This is on my "to do" list. This port will generate 64-bit binaries
only, but of course the 32-bit Windows port will still be there for
those who need to generate 32-bit binaries.
At this point, the main difficulty in this port is to set up a Win64
development machine. There are no Win64 machines in my vicinity, and
given the way purchase orders work at INRIA, it's unlikely there will
be one before March 2006.
Also, I could use recommendations and experience return about 64-bit
Windows development tools. What does Microsoft provides, preferably
for free? (What is needed: a C compiler, a linker, an assembler, and
import libraries for standard Windows DLLs.) Where is the reference
manual for the assembler syntax? (As usual, I couldn't find any
complete description in MSDN.) Any hints on when x86-64
versions of Mingw and Cygwin will be available?
Feel free to reply privately, as this isn't very topical for caml-list.
Regards,
- Xavier Leroy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ocaml Win64 build?
2005-09-22 12:41 ` Ocaml Win64 build? Xavier Leroy
@ 2005-09-27 9:29 ` Dmitry Bely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Bely @ 2005-09-27 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> writes:
>> Do you have any plans to release Ocaml in an x86_64 bit version for Windows?
>> Or a 32-bit version that can also generate 64-bit binaries? In fact,
>> this would be preferable to having a 64-bit version that cannot
>> generate 32-bit binaries.
>
> This is on my "to do" list. This port will generate 64-bit binaries
> only, but of course the 32-bit Windows port will still be there for
> those who need to generate 32-bit binaries.
IIRC some time ago you were talking of possible x86+SSE2 Ocaml port with a
decent floating point performance. Is there any hope that it may happen in
the foreseeable future?
- Dmitry Bely
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-09-27 9:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <caee5ad80509180700433f1024@mail.gmail.com>
2005-09-22 12:41 ` Ocaml Win64 build? Xavier Leroy
2005-09-27 9:29 ` [Caml-list] " Dmitry Bely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).