From: Michael Ekstrand <michael@elehack.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: about OcamIL
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 07:29:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ht0i3c$adr$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100519094634.63006zi1h04x95z4@imp.ovh.net>
On 05/19/2010 03:46 AM, forum@x9c.fr wrote:
> Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com> a écrit :
>
> (...)
>
>> I don't think this is heated at all. We were talking about "high
>> performance" languages and you cited a bunch of languages that get
>> whipped by Python on this benchmark:
>>
>> http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/f-vs-ocaml-vs-haskell-hash-table.html
>>
>
> Acknowledged. "Whipped" is here 2 times slower on that particular
> benchmark, while Python is rarely within an order of magnitude of
> OCaml code (cf. the language shootout). Moreover, hashtables are
> ubiquitous in Python (and hence probably particularly optimized),
> while they are not so common in Haskell or Caml.
Yes, Python's hash tables are particularly optimized due to their wide
pervasive usage. When you're testing Python hash tables, you're really
testing a carefully-written, thoroughly-tuned C implementation of hash
tables.
- Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-05 12:06 ben kuin
2010-05-05 14:19 ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
[not found] ` <i2sc0c8bc8b1005051446q34b07d37xc4021d2b4b23d4e2@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4BE28085.5090100@lexifi.com>
2010-05-06 10:59 ` ben kuin
2010-05-05 18:58 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-05-05 19:16 ` Ed Keith
2010-05-05 20:15 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-05-05 22:13 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2010-05-05 22:36 ` ben kuin
2010-05-05 23:13 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-05-06 10:45 ` ben kuin
2010-05-06 14:38 ` Tim Hanson
2010-05-05 22:18 ` ben kuin
2010-05-06 11:13 ` Ed Keith
2010-05-06 10:43 ` Dmitry Bely
2010-05-06 16:33 ` Peng Zang
2010-05-07 7:26 ` Dmitry Bely
2010-05-07 8:25 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2010-05-10 21:53 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2010-05-11 11:22 ` ben kuin
2010-05-11 16:39 ` Peng Zang
2010-05-11 17:35 ` Raoul Duke
2010-05-11 23:47 ` ben kuin
2010-05-12 1:57 ` Peng Zang
2010-05-12 11:56 ` Jon Harrop
2010-05-11 17:38 ` Raoul Duke
2010-05-12 12:28 ` Jon Harrop
2010-05-12 13:11 ` forum
2010-05-14 10:40 ` Jon Harrop
2010-05-14 10:58 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-05-14 11:51 ` forum
2010-05-14 11:51 ` forum
2010-05-16 20:31 ` Jon Harrop
2010-05-17 7:53 ` forum
2010-05-19 0:17 ` Jon Harrop
2010-05-19 7:46 ` forum
2010-05-19 11:29 ` Michael Ekstrand [this message]
2010-05-19 13:27 ` [Caml-list] " Eray Ozkural
2010-05-19 13:35 ` David Allsopp
2010-05-19 15:23 ` Erick Tryzelaar
2010-05-19 16:49 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-19 16:48 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-20 2:03 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2010-05-14 13:55 ` Ed Keith
2010-05-14 15:17 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-14 16:26 ` ben kuin
2010-05-14 16:32 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2010-05-14 20:08 ` ben kuin
2010-05-14 21:28 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2010-05-14 21:29 ` [Caml-list] " Vincent Aravantinos
2010-05-14 23:51 ` ben kuin
2010-05-15 0:48 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2010-05-14 18:11 ` Raoul Duke
2010-05-14 18:59 ` ben kuin
[not found] ` <AANLkTik-EuZRmX8VKMdAIsO_t8JGHvS6F9TPVLkohed8@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-14 21:42 ` Fwd: " Raoul Duke
2010-05-14 21:47 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2010-05-14 21:57 ` Raoul Duke
2010-05-15 0:16 ` ben kuin
2010-05-15 0:43 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-05-15 2:16 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-15 21:27 ` Jon Harrop
2010-05-16 3:19 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-15 9:45 ` ben kuin
2010-05-15 12:07 ` Ed Keith
2010-05-15 12:17 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2010-05-15 13:21 ` ben kuin
2010-05-15 22:18 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-05-15 23:39 ` ben kuin
2010-05-16 3:23 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-15 13:23 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-15 21:45 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-05-15 21:44 ` Jon Harrop
2010-05-15 22:25 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-05-16 2:04 ` Jon Harrop
2010-05-16 3:20 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-16 17:50 ` Eray Ozkural
2010-05-16 19:15 ` ben kuin
2010-05-05 21:59 ` ben kuin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='ht0i3c$adr$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=michael@elehack.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).