From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5980CBC57 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:45:58 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoIBAFAKx0vRVaA0kGdsb2JhbACPRYIFihoIFQEBAQEJCQwHEQMfriOBcYYeLohNAQEDBYUJBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,214,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="57124722" Received: from mail-pw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2010 21:45:57 +0200 Received: by pwi1 with SMTP id 1so1327757pwi.39 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:45:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cRm8BI6sT6X7dTpPXDTvrZNXEGFTqPMM9OI7Qdf3MhY=; b=aR3Mt8+WaqJXVOSXN3jxPOXV0Bp6wH7HqXikVopnYBoYRMVHJcgX15xmP38pxdRCu0 veWoEfWCojeUTff14gs60x4g+tz8kd6mJQGwxXIoVar+AyNdd0WNIhGzYa4ETs3NLuDJ dr8O1tOPRDv29pEXVAVLowInq1gklOzUWHvBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=AIYyAgaPwo8LLs1jNqXjnpILM7JZWCqe0TkBg7618j6ttkZLiCcbeMHyyTtxluuuxr MAmIKOU0HUulrCbZGNptpGlR2dRXwiqsjxN0oh31m1FpN03/XQ0YB0cH+HZC2HTfVes3 5A9FjuUGCWTXePnmYm+a8QLJ83CYc3s14+Xt4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.176.4 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:45:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2D329B0F-E57C-4449-949C-DB0D9D64F2DE@gmail.com> References: <2D329B0F-E57C-4449-949C-DB0D9D64F2DE@gmail.com> From: Ashish Agarwal Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:45:35 -0400 Received: by 10.142.117.15 with SMTP id p15mr477466wfc.199.1271360756439; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Inspect libary To: Kaspar Rohrer Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0a8f044db7b04844bbed9 X-Spam: no; 0.00; lgpl:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 lgpl:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 1975:98 2.1:98 3.0:98 2.1:98 3.0:98 beginners:01 beginners:01 --001636e0a8f044db7b04844bbed9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Regarding LGPL 2.1 versus 3.0, I recently tried finding the linking exception for 3.0 but concluded that no one has written it yet (from postings to the OCaml list, beginners list, and contacting the FSF). So if you're going to include the linking exception, which most LGPL'd ocaml libraries do, and you don't want to write the linking exception yourself, then your only choice is 2.1. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Kaspar Rohrer wrote: > Hi everybody > > Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions regarding hosting and licensing > of my little library. I think I will host the code on github, because I > really like the clean and shiny UI. > As for the license, I'm strongly favoring the LGPL license ATM, but I am > unsure whether I should go with version 2.1 or 3.0. And whether or not I > need to add a linking exception. Any opinions on that? > > I'm currently documenting the source code and should be ready to release > this evening. > > Thanks > Kaspar Rohrer > > PS: Does somebody know why all of my browsers (Firefox, Safari, Camino on > OS X 10.6) do not recognize the Forge.ocamlcore.org server certificate? > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > --001636e0a8f044db7b04844bbed9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Regarding LGPL 2.1 versus 3.0, I recently tried finding the linking excepti= on for 3.0 but concluded that no one has written it yet (from postings to t= he OCaml list, beginners list, and contacting the FSF). So if you're go= ing to include the linking exception, which most LGPL'd ocaml libraries= do, and you don't want to write the linking exception yourself, then y= our only choice is 2.1.


On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Kaspar = Rohrer <kas= par.rohrer@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everybody

Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions regarding hosting and licensing= of my little library. I think I will host the code on github, because I re= ally like the clean and shiny UI.
As for the license, I'm strongly favoring the LGPL license ATM, but I a= m unsure whether I should go with version 2.1 or 3.0. And whether or not I = need to add a linking exception. Any opinions on that?

I'm currently documenting the source code and should be ready to releas= e this evening.

Thanks
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Kaspar Rohrer

PS: Does somebody know why all of my browsers (Firefox, Safari, Camino on O= S X 10.6) do not recognize the Forge.ocamlcore.org server certificate?

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.in= ria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

--001636e0a8f044db7b04844bbed9--