From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA13422; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:16:50 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA13294 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:16:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rinet.ru (relay.rinet.ru [195.54.192.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h0OBGnr19172 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:16:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.rinet.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.rinet.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0OBGl8b006644 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:16:48 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from dbely@mail.ru) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by relay.rinet.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with UUCP id h0OBGl5c006643 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:16:47 +0300 (MSK) Received: from bely.stormoff (BELY) [192.168.0.10] by stormoff with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18c1p3-0003KU-00; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:16:33 +0300 X-Comment-To: Sven Luther To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: License wars References: <15915.65485.636419.969429@lachesis.inria.fr> <20030120164653.GA6351@swordfish> <87ptqpunpk.fsf_-_@ketanu.dyndns.org> <3E2FC73D.1030003@baretta.com> <20030116103038.GA18198@swordfish> <022e01c2bd5b$1cb988b0$0a00a8c0@gateway> <15915.65485.636419.969429@lachesis.inria.fr> <20030120164653.GA6351@swordfish> <87ptqpunpk.fsf_-_@ketanu.dyndns.org> <20030124053337.GA25551@swordfish> <20030124084607.GA1471@iliana> From: Dmitry Bely Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:16:37 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20030124084607.GA1471@iliana> (Sven Luther's message of "Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:46:07 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support (Windows), i586-pc-win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Sven Luther writes: > BTW, a dual licence GPL+proprietary, is even better then for you than > the BSd, since you can release the software under GPL for everyone, and > then have another proprietary release for folk not wanting the GPL. It's only possible if you don't accept any patches from other people. The patch's copyright is holded by its creator, so you cannot distribute entire product under different license without the written permission from anyone who contributed some code to your project. > With > a BSD licence, this is not the case, because anyone can take the code > and make anything they want with it. - Dmitry Bely ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners