From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E6A7ED26
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun, 27 May 2012 18:53:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArgCAJZbwk9QW+UDgGdsb2JhbABEox2ReyIBARQoJ4IXAQEFOCQtCxguEBM0EwgBARaHYgEOBAemIYZaChmBC4h3jSyDFgOVF5Jt
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,666,1330902000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="160178236"
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 27 May 2012 18:53:23 +0200
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1SYgiX-0007QN-Mn
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 27 May 2012 18:53:21 +0200
Received: from seas357.wlan.seas.upenn.edu ([158.130.105.102])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sun, 27 May 2012 18:53:21 +0200
Received: from bobzhang1988 by seas357.wlan.seas.upenn.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sun, 27 May 2012 18:53:21 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: caml-list@inria.fr
From: Hongbo Zhang <bobzhang1988@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 12:53:04 -0400
Message-ID: <jptm5g$bul$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <CAH2fdNZ+-COr_HWoD_q1JS2uV1syRfaXkncokrtdxD45qyZnCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: seas357.wlan.seas.upenn.edu
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
In-Reply-To: <CAH2fdNZ+-COr_HWoD_q1JS2uV1syRfaXkncokrtdxD45qyZnCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Syntax extensions without Camlp4

On 5/27/12 11:06 AM, Alexandre Pilkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was surfing the web, and found this one year old blog post:
> http://www.lexifi.com/blog/syntax-extensions-without-camlp4 . Are they
> any news on that front? That seemed very promising!
>
Well, I don't think it's good to downplay camlp4. The problem is we need 
more documentation and more tests.
> Cheers,
> Alex
>