From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9C1BC37 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 05:43:34 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au4AADU7B0pQW+UCe2dsb2JhbACXDwEBFiIEtTaDfgWFWQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,326,1238968800"; d="scan'208";a="39726237" Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) ([80.91.229.2]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 11 May 2009 05:43:34 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M3MQL-0006NI-HB for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 11 May 2009 03:43:29 +0000 Received: from 75-119-237-102.dsl.teksavvy.com ([75.119.237.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 03:43:29 +0000 Received: from monnier by 75-119-237-102.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 03:43:29 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: Ocamlopt x86-32 and SSE2 Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:43:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <90823c940904281236x61204451nac149ee15b5df73a@mail.gmail.com> <4A0005C8.8010609@inria.fr> <90823c940905050241y11f012e5xee8316e3e4337ff9@mail.gmail.com> <4A0407A9.4000009@inria.fr> <87eiuxuslu.fsf@pat35-1-82-229-60-210.fbx.proxad.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 75-119-237-102.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ffb7sy28hKE+YgVe5+i50LUkPAo= Sender: news X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocamlopt:01 ocamlopt:01 slower:02 native:03 mean:08 machines:12 machines:12 think:13 umontreal:13 should:13 case:13 using:15 slow:15 running:15 can't:17 > As far as I know, one is using ocamlopt to improve performance. > I can't think of any case where one would need native code running on > pre-SS2 machines which are so outdated performance-wise. You mean we should make slow machines even slower? Stefan