From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81ADBBAF for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:05:07 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj4FAKKv6kxQW+UMgWdsb2JhbACBVJMPjgcVAQEWIiKsa4dkiQyFSwSKXg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,239,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="80003572" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2010 03:05:07 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKiFk-0005gO-QC for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:05:04 +0100 Received: from c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.7.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:05:04 +0100 Received: from igouy2 by c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:05:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Isaac Gouy Subject: Re: Is OCaml fast? Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1290434674.16005.354.camel@thinkpad> <20101122180203.2126497sau3zukgb@webmail.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 24.4.7.10 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.12) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 univ-orleans:01 brent:98 writes:01 bagley:02 bagley:02 shootout:02 doug:03 doug:03 variable:06 benchmarks:07 noted:08 wrong:10 environment:10 game:13 David Rajchenbach-Teller univ-orleans.fr> writes: > I can confirm that old code-snippets were removed (and that both faster solutions and environment > variable tweaks were rejected). Even back in 2001, Doug Bagley had noted all the things that were wrong with the tasks on his "The Great Computer Language Shootout". During autumn 2004, on Brent Fulgham's website, new tasks were added and old Doug Bagley tasks removed. By 2005 only 2 tasks remained from that old Doug Bagley website. By August 2008 none of those old Doug Bagley tasks were measured for the current benchmarks game.