From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43A4BBAF for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:07:24 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai8FANyR60xQW+UMgWdsb2JhbACBVZMQjgMVAQEWIiKuE4c4iQyFSwSKXg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,243,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="67920311" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2010 19:07:24 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKxH1-00076o-7P for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:07:23 +0100 Received: from c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.7.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:07:23 +0100 Received: from igouy2 by c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:07:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Isaac Gouy Subject: Re: Is OCaml fast? Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1290434674.16005.354.camel@thinkpad> <20101123.113733.2059974256209184038.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be> <065e01cb8b26$29e36e60$7daa4b20$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 24.4.7.10 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.12) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 haskell:01 writes:01 shootout:02 noted:08 question:13 but:14 solution:14 www:84 since:17 different:22 com:74 com:74 way:25 yahoo:25 Jon Harrop googlemail.com> writes: > Ketil Malde crafted > a much better solution but noted: > > "This is considered cheating, since it is the easy and natural way to do > it." - > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Shootout/Knucleotide Not even cheating - just an answer to a different question.