From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA517BC67 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:23:24 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqkEALLp60xQW+UMgWdsb2JhbACBVZMTjgQVAQEWIiKtV4ceiQyFSwSKXg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,245,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="80079043" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2010 01:23:24 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PL38t-0006wG-9m for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:23:23 +0100 Received: from c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.7.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:23:23 +0100 Received: from igouy2 by c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:23:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Isaac Gouy Subject: Re: Is OCaml fast? Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1290434674.16005.354.camel@thinkpad> <20101122180203.2126497sau3zukgb@webmail.in-berlin.de> <20101123232742.GC28768@siouxsie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 24.4.7.10 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.12) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 in-berlin:01 oliver:01 writes:01 bagley:02 bagley:02 shootout:02 shootout:02 doug:03 doug:03 noted:08 wrong:10 wrong:10 things:13 www:84 first.in-berlin.de> writes: > > Even back in 2001, Doug Bagley had noted all the things that were > > wrong with the tasks on his "The Great Computer Language Shootout". > > And what was wrong in his eyes? Find out for yourself: http://web.archive.org/web/20010617014807/www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/ > So, now the comparisions are perfect? Has anyone said so? > What problems were removed? All of them.