From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04707BBAF for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 01:16:46 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAAg67UxQW+UMgWdsb2JhbACBVpMsjgcVAQEWIiKtSoctiQmFRwSKYA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,250,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="68008665" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Nov 2010 01:16:46 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLPVx-0001yw-LA for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 01:16:41 +0100 Received: from c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.7.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 01:16:41 +0100 Received: from igouy2 by c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 01:16:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Isaac Gouy Subject: Re: Is OCaml fast? Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 24.4.7.10 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.12) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 erroneously:01 abbreviation:01 graph:01 writes:01 shootout:02 shootout:02 interpret:03 languages:03 languages:03 prefixed:04 benchmarks:07 benchmarks:07 quotation:08 haven't:09 David Allsopp metastack.com> writes: > > > (NB. The shootout > > > doesn't claim that the final ranking displayed is anything other than > > > a score of how well the languages did > > > at the various benchmarks given - but a graph like that is easy to > > > interpret erroneously in that way) > > -snip- > Which part of my statement "The shootout doesn't claim that the final ranking displayed is anything other > than a score of how well the languages did at the various benchmarks given" (prefixed with the Latin > abbreviation for "Note well") caused you to need to write this? The part you haven't included in your quotation ;-)