From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67488BBAF for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:22:35 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtgEAI447kxQW+UMgWdsb2JhbACBVpMxjgcVAQEWIiKILKcHhwyJCYVHBIph X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,256,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="80985794" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Nov 2010 19:22:11 +0100 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLgSP-0004Mi-JA for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:22:09 +0100 Received: from c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.7.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:22:09 +0100 Received: from igouy2 by c-24-4-7-10.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:22:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Isaac Gouy Subject: Re: Is OCaml fast? Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1290434674.16005.354.camel@thinkpad> <20101122180203.2126497sau3zukgb@webmail.in-berlin.de> <20101123232742.GC28768@siouxsie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 24.4.7.10 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.12) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 blog:98 writes:01 shootout:02 shootout:02 submissions:04 debian:04 break:08 example:10 maybe:10 rules:11 rules:11 php:87 umontreal:13 broken:14 Stefan Monnier iro.umontreal.ca> writes: -snip- > Of course, the shootout could be improved. Of course, anyone interested can do their own more extensive comparisons for a couple of language implementations, for example - http://blog.marketcetera.com/2007/03/08/java-and-the-computer-language-shootout/ > E.g. maybe it could allow > extra submissions that break the rules, along with a description of > which rules were broken and how. -snip- Page search "alternative" on http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32q/performance.php?test=binarytrees