From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA23454; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:53:02 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA23565 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:53:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from leia.mandrakesoft.com (office.mandrakesoft.com [195.68.114.34]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f9RJr1v03016 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:53:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by leia.mandrakesoft.com (Postfix, from userid 505) id D42FE5708; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:51:05 +0200 (CEST) To: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] raise extra arg ignored From: Pixel Date: 27 Oct 2001 21:51:05 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk failwith "foo" "bar" failwith "foo" are equivalent. exception Foo;; raise Foo 1 raise Foo same for this. I understand why it typechecks, but couldn't there be a special check for this since it can't be useful (or can it??) -- Pixel ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr