From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB7FBC88 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:06:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j16G67ul006021 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:06:07 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA29807 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:06:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from leia.mandrakesoft.com (ezoffice.mandrakesoft.com [212.11.15.34]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j16G66MV006018 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:06:07 +0100 Received: by leia.mandrakesoft.com (Postfix, from userid 505) id 61E8423F9F; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:06:37 +0100 (CET) Sender: pixel@mandrakesoft.com To: Sven Luther Cc: stef@payrard.net, Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] dependancy problems? References: <20050118073327.GA8298@cachan-2-82-67-232-89.fbx.proxad.net> <200501180809.15056.jon@jdh30.plus.com> <20050118082522.GB8298@cachan-2-82-67-232-89.fbx.proxad.net> <20050118122712.GA28131@pegasos> From: Pixel Date: 06 Feb 2005 17:06:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20050118122712.GA28131@pegasos> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4206406F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4206406E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 dependancy:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 wrote:01 usr:01 lib:01 ocaml:01 lablgtk:01 gtkthread:01 cmx:01 usr:01 lib:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Sven Luther writes: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:25:22AM +0100, St=E9phane Payrard wrote: [...] > > > > I get the following message when trying to compile: > > > > > > > > Files /usr/lib/ocaml/lablgtk/gtkThread.cmx > > > > and /usr/lib/ocaml/threads/threads.cmxa > > > > make inconsistent assumptions over implementation Thread > > > > > > > > Should I use different versiosn of either lablgtk or ocaml? > > > > The INSTALL file suggest OCaml 3.07 and LablGtk 1.2.6 . > > > > Or is there an easy way to tweak cameleon to get it to compile > > > > with the ocaml and lablgtk versions I have. > > >=20 > > > I think this problem is due to different ocaml versions being used to= generate=20 > > > lablgtk and threads. > >=20 > > Does this mean that the mandrake people have not done a proper job > > about dependancies? I have installed unison that also uses > > lablgtk. There is no problem there. So I am puzzled. >=20 > Probably yes. Or maybe just the binary compatibility problem with 3.08.1 = ro > 3.08.2 migration, so it did not hit only debian. right, i've rebuilt LablGtk and now it works. (sorry for the answer time)