From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57FEBC37 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:04:27 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIAAKRP+ElQW+UCe2dsb2JhbACWaAEBFiIEuQ+DdQU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,268,1238968800"; d="scan'208";a="39234378" Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) ([80.91.229.2]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 29 Apr 2009 22:04:27 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LzG13-0003r5-A7 for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:04:25 +0000 Received: from 97-113-251-224.tukw.qwest.net ([97.113.251.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:04:25 +0000 Received: from dynasticon by 97-113-251-224.tukw.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:04:25 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Jeffrey Scofield Subject: Re: Ocamlopt code generator question Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:04:16 -0700 Message-ID: References: <90823c940904281236x61204451nac149ee15b5df73a@mail.gmail.com> <90823c940904290950t204e354dm6921863ab44e889e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 97-113-251-224.tukw.qwest.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:K4XQdqGfaoInGjSdU+uWDm89ZcI= Sender: news X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocamlopt:01 unboxed:01 dmitry:01 dmitry:01 functions:01 writes:01 bely:01 bely:01 floats:02 external:03 external:03 loc:03 loc:03 correction:05 arguments:07 Dmitry Bely writes: > No - for external C functions loc_external_arguments and > loc_external_results are used. And of course unboxed floats can be > acceptable there. Whoops, I was obviously thinking of loc_external_arguments. I should have looked at the code again before posting! Sorry for the confusion, and thanks for the correction. Regards, Jeff Scofield Seattle