From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA28634; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:29:51 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA20882 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:29:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.44]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h8S8Tn524631 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:29:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from diebuntekuh.de (dialin-212-144-208-078.arcor-ip.net [212.144.208.78]) by mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE3BD0514 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:29:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by diebuntekuh.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1B9926088D3; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:44:22 +0200 (CEST) To: OCaml List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Schoca 0.0 - first release announcement References: <20030928050538.GC22894@ucdavis.edu> From: Christoph Bauer Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:44:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030928050538.GC22894@ucdavis.edu> (Issac Trotts's message of "Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:05:38 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 0.0:01 bauer:01 bauer:01 camlp:01 unspecified:01 guile:01 unspecified:01 bigloo:01 foreach:01 expr:01 makefile:02 binary:02 compile:02 interpreter:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, > This is nice. Thanks for implementing it and making it free. > By the way, I was able to compile it just fine without > xstrp4, a library that I couldn't seem to find. In the Makefile I have > this: > > PACKAGES=camlp4 # xstrp4 Thanks. Yes, schoca don't need this package. BTW, the you can find the package at http://www.ocaml-programming.de/programming/download-caml.html > Also, can you tell me why it prints out "#unspecified" for procedure > calls instead of no output (as in Guile). This is a hint for the programmer when the result of a function call is unspecified by R5RS. E.g. from R5RS: "The result of the `set!' expression is unspecified." The bigloo interpreter has a similar behavior. Christoph -- proc self {} {foreach c [split [info body self] ""] d {14 -7 0 0 4 -67 4 73 11 69 24 -83 -15 6 -4 -84 78 20 11 -78 -1 -1 79 19 -8 4} { binary scan $c c c if {[catch {append r [format %c [expr $c+$d]]}]} {return $r};}};puts [self] ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners