From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA15698; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:00:51 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA18928 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:00:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from gremlin.ics.uci.edu (gremlin.ics.uci.edu [128.195.1.70]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with SMTP id f2L80mL00468 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:00:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from [128.195.169.111] ( vp169111.reshsg.uci.edu [128.195.169.111] ) by gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu id aa27976 for ; 21 Mar 2001 00:00 PST Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: ndalton@pop.ics.uci.edu Message-Id: Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:47 -0800 To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Niall Dalton Subject: [Caml-list] Inline assembly? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi there, Is it possible to use inline assembly in ocaml? If not, what is the lowest overhead way to approximate it? Using a C function which includes the asm? Best regards, Niall ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr