From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sideskate@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69866BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu,  6 May 2010 16:38:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtQCAKlx4ktKfVI0mGdsb2JhbACdYQgXAQEBCAkMBxEirE+CAIVaLohOAQEDBYUOBA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,341,1270418400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="62324698"
Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 06 May 2010 16:38:35 +0200
Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so14555wwi.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Thu, 06 May 2010 07:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=3DEcbNnfcnwSZc6DitXjcjmmugucBmnjQ9rL/CpXlqY=;
        b=pP4WJyP0ChNnSoWpwHYPmeG+e8TBM38PWbk95vQAVDduLpE/9x5VRGFXGNipdz9wXt
         c+mH51X+YuLiMOyGAZU6YYrYuiR0P2YXACozSHJ+0na76VEoc/aowvkIUZP2ckIhzrWO
         E5bOVTYmcK/wU3z4qRxZ3Jzu0GDLRWZrTI8cw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=v6kcDHp6lFv2n8drhLsTYt5doVusXcifhkgH+MpTIltJjVoDGnrF6oxBqRQhSQN8cO
         NDTdVXHaiRg2E4/rEnJ+dKueeIH6gdMnaptAFAxFniu41uY4oxhphguAzo/2S17idqRX
         EaZohUlDny06IBeMb0dDgVNYeC2WgdNyM5Ccs=
Received: by 10.216.187.7 with SMTP id x7mr1123359wem.134.1273156713605; Thu, 
	06 May 2010 07:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.167.1 with HTTP; Thu, 6 May 2010 07:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <z2nc0c8bc8b1005051536v1ea6ab02h54c794bd8018b6dc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <951508.20587.qm@web58708.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <698DAC90-16B7-452B-B43D-B5A708380231@gmail.com> 
	<z2nc0c8bc8b1005051536v1ea6ab02h54c794bd8018b6dc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Hanson <sideskate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 10:38:12 -0400
Message-ID: <p2x9d2084741005060738z1a44f2eeo6e06ee9d669e9447@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
To: ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com>
Cc: Vincent Aravantinos <vincent.aravantinos@gmail.com>,
	caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam: no; 0.00; lablgtk:01 guis:01 packagers:01 labltk:01 lablgtk:01 bindings:01 doable:01 props:98 4.2:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 dependency:01 gui:03 gui:03 debian:04 

lablGTK2 on linux is not fragile!  Its robust, well designed, and
produces nice guis!
(at least on debian.  props to the packagers and developers, if you're
listening)

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:36 PM, ben kuin <benkuin@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the main problem is the lack of cross platform gui that looks
> good on windows.
>
> LablTk: ok only for simple gui
> LablGtk: =A0 =A0fragile on linux, bad on windows
> qt: =A0 =A0 =A0I once tried to create bindings for a newer qt release ( >
> 4.2), I didn't finished it, but I think it would be doable. The big
> problem though is the huge qt dependency with this blackboxy C++/moc
> thing .