From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA17173; Sun, 13 May 2001 22:55:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA17167 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Sun, 13 May 2001 22:55:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA05645 for ; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:01:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pochi.inria.fr (pochi.inria.fr [128.93.8.128]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4AE1kn26056; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:01:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from mentre@localhost) by pochi.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) id f4AE1l926601; Thu, 10 May 2001 16:01:47 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: pochi.inria.fr: mentre set sender to David.Mentre@inria.fr using -f To: Sven LUTHER Cc: Fabrice Le Fessant , John Max Skaller , Markus Mottl , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CDK binary release References: <15094.25994.675673.222337@cremant.inria.fr> <20010509125858.B28402@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> <3AF9852A.F2B18679@ozemail.com.au> <20010510004003.A27333@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> <3AF9D067.93E6DE1A@ozemail.com.au> <15098.23852.403551.65183@cremant.inria.fr> <20010510131646.A20887@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> From: David Mentre Date: 10 May 2001 16:01:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20010510131646.A20887@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Sven LUTHER writes: > What about sgml, most project use that, and they can then transform it in many > different format afterward. Or XML? (yes, I know, yet another buzzword) In the Linux Documentation Project, they use heavily SGML or XML with the DocBook DTD. From that format, they have tools to generate to LaTeX, info, text, HTML, and RTF. From that you can generate MS Word, PostScript, PDF, etc. Ok, maybe an ocaml file is not a whole DocBook document, but using DocBook tags would be a plus I think. From the files of a project, the CDK doc tool could generate the whole XML DocBook document. One problem against that solution is that DocBook tags are a bit verbose: http://linuxdoc.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/writing-docbook.html Of course, I've not developed anything, so feel free to delete those remarks. :) My 2 cents, d. -- David.Mentre@inria.fr -- http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/ Opinions expressed here are only mine. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr