From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5015BC6C for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:48:48 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAM+jokfAXQImh2dsb2JhbACQJQEBAQgKKZ01 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,290,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="22054233" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 13:48:48 +0100 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m11CmXIE016943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:48:48 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAFujokdQW+UCh2dsb2JhbACQJQEBAQgEBimdMQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,290,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="6816459" Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) ([80.91.229.2]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 13:48:33 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JKvJi-00053F-PF for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:48:26 +0000 Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:48:26 +0000 Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:48:26 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: Ocamlcore.org: Discussions place, and requirements Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200802011336.09562.toots@rastageeks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl2 (Debian) Sender: news X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 47A31521.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 cpan:01 wrote:01 modules:02 modules:02 checking:02 strong:96 let:03 perhaps:05 enforce:05 i'd:06 discussions:08 discussions:08 On 01-02-2008, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Hi all ! > > I have two question related to the recent discussions around ocaml community. > > First of all, I'd like to know if we should continu discussing here, or we > better switch to a new mailing list. > > There's a mailman almost ready on ocamlcore.org, so perhaps it should be > better to continue on a mailing list there ? > Mail system is not enough tested to let people use it for now. I hope it will be fixed soon, but we have to do some extended checking before announcing on a public mailing list the availability of ocamlcore.org! > > Second questions is ocaml modules that we are going to distribute there. I think your question worth to be asked, but i don't think it is related to ocamlcore.org. The forge hosted at this location will be for all ocaml related project. I don't think we will enforce the use of any particular build system. In the future, we can set up another system to centralize modules -- like a CPAN for ocaml. But this is another topic (i.e we should take time to build something strong). Regards, Sylvain Le Gall