From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6084FBBC1 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:20:28 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAOaKskfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQPQEBAQgKKZxd X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,346,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7270085" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2008 15:20:28 +0100 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m1DEKRPZ017373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:20:28 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAOaKskdQW+UCn2dsb2JhbACQPQEBAQEBBgQGCQgYnF0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,346,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7270083" Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) ([80.91.229.2]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2008 15:20:27 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JPITF-0006ZY-HZ for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:20:21 +0000 Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:20:21 +0000 Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:20:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: [OSR] Ports-like package management system Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <479F0664.2070706@exalead.com> <1202892353.6427.4.camel@Blefuscu> <1202904809.6116.8.camel@Blefuscu> <1202911111.6116.10.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl2 (Debian) Sender: news X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47B2FCAB.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 univ-orleans:01 tarballs:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 organized:02 archives:02 tgz:02 tgz:02 innocuous:05 implement:06 wed:06 indeed:07 sufficient:08 nicolas:08 On 13-02-2008, David Teller wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 13:48 +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: >> Indeed, this could be. But what i call "ocaml-archives" won't be >> ocamlbuild related. It will just be archives organized such as that >> making possible to use them in an automated way. >> >> Regards, >> Sylvain Le Gall > > Unless I'm mistaken, this "use_tgz" tag would be sufficient to start and > would be innocuous enough that it wouldn't get in the way of > ocaml-archives, whenever their format gets specified, wouldn't it ? > I think if Nicolas Pouillard wants/has the time to implement "use_tgz" this sound a good idea. For now, i think ocaml-archives should only take care of downloading/making accessible tarballs. Ocaml-archives won't go into distribution specific details -- for now. If we succeed in doing so, we will see what can be done with it. Regards, Sylvain Le Gall