From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537A8BBC1 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:30:53 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq0BAPrI2EfAXQImh2dsb2JhbACQcwEBAQgKKZcs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,493,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="10223080" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2008 14:30:53 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2DDUpbW019285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:30:52 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq0BAK7J2EdQW+UCh2dsb2JhbACQcwEBAQgKKZcv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,493,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="9394726" Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) ([80.91.229.2]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2008 14:30:52 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZnWB-0006Dq-Sz for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:47 +0000 Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:47 +0000 Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:47 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: OSR: META files for packages containing syntax extensions Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <98095.73991.qm@web54601.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20080313132121.GB4817@stratocaster.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl2 (Debian) Sender: news X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 47D92C8B.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 syntax:01 syntax:01 camlp:01 camlp:01 wrote:01 defining:02 extension:06 extension:06 discussion:06 break:08 cases:08 meta:89 agree:12 doesn't:12 On 13-03-2008, Eric Cooper wrote: >> Topic for discussion: without prejudice for those cases where an >> alternative name may be far more suitable, it would be nice if >> packages of this type containing a single syntax extension were to >> agree on a common name for the subpackage defining that extension. >> Some possibilities are "extension", "pa", "pp", etc. > > If it doesn't break anything, I suggest "syntax". > What about "camlp4"/"camlp5" ? At least it will allow to make the difference between the two. Regards, Sylvain Le Gall