From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8421CBB84 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:08:42 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At8CAEduKknAXQImgWdsb2JhbACTXgEBFiK9GIJ8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,660,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="20321218" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2008 18:08:42 +0100 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id mAOH8feO002643 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:08:42 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsAAAEduKklQW+UCe2dsb2JhbACTXgEBFiIEvRSCfA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,660,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="17551708" Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) ([80.91.229.2]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 24 Nov 2008 18:08:41 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L4evQ-0007wb-2h for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:08:40 +0000 Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:08:40 +0000 Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:08:40 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: [ANN] Kaputt 1.0 alpha Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <8D0DD4BD-CCA5-4640-84E4-5F14F0804035@x9c.fr> <20081123213044.GA32214@usha.takhisis.invalid> <1227482073.4929e3d999bca@imp.ovh.net> <87tz9xt6bb.fsf@aryx.cs.uiuc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-102 (Linux) Sender: news X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 492ADF99.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 1.0:98 wrote:01 functions:01 writes:01 modules:02 library:03 quite:08 seem:08 alpha:08 libraries:11 bit:11 lightweight:12 agree:12 such:14 On 24-11-2008, Yoann Padioleau wrote: > forum@x9c.fr writes: > > One criticism is that like many other libraries, such as oUnit, > ocamlcalendar, they seem a little bit heavyweight. You got hundreds > of functions, 5 modules ... > I always found oUnit quite lightweight compared to other. It is part of those library small enough to understand quickly. So I don't agree on the fact that "oUnit" is heavyweight. Regards, Sylvain Le Gall