From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D34BBBAF for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:04:26 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArICANf9pkpQW+UMgWdsb2JhbACbQQEBFiTBOoQYBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,357,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="33938687" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 09 Sep 2009 10:04:25 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MlIAC-0000wR-9a for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:04:24 +0200 Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:04:24 +0200 Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:04:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: probability of some events Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4AA73950.9000901@gulfsat.mg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-11 (Linux) Sender: news X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 ,...:98 wrote:01 incompatible:01 probability:01 seems:03 gui:03 problem:05 inria:06 quite:08 bit:11 changes:12 changes:12 Hello, On 09-09-2009, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > > 2°) Now the question > > Are you aware of such future changes in OCaml, that would lead to > incompatibility? OCaml is quite conservative and don't add incompatible features very easily. I think INRIA team is aware of that and wishing to keep it this way. > > We intend to begin huge developments in OCaml (Web, GUI, system,...) > and such changes will make our task a bit more difficult. > At least for the 2-3 years coming there will be no problem for sure. After that, we cannot predict the future ;-) But if your concern is stability of language, OCaml seems a good choice. Regards, Sylvain Le Gall