From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1233CBC37
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:26:47 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al0GAANU6EpQW+UMgGdsb2JhbACbQQEBFCZHAwEBvkOEPwSBYQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,641,1249250400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="35774887"
Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 28 Oct 2009 22:26:46 +0100
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1N3G2X-0006Oh-F8
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:26:45 +0100
Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:26:45 +0100
Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:26:45 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: caml-list@inria.fr
From: Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net>
Subject:  Re: How to read different ints from a Bigarray?
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:26:21 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID:  <slrnhehdnt.q9j.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org>
References:  <87eiond3of.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
 <slrnhegkik.q9j.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org>
 <87639zd0m9.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
 <slrnhego3u.q9j.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org>
 <87tyxj5rkv.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
 <slrnheh2pc.q9j.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org>
 <87my3bnsa1.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-11 (Linux)
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 bigarray:01 le-gall:01 stubs:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 ints:01 int:01 writes:01 writes:01 bits:05 implement:06 probably:07 bit:11 think:13 

On 28-10-2009, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
> Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net> writes:
>> On 28-10-2009, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
>>> Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net> writes:
>>>> On 28-10-2009, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
>>>>> Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net> writes:
>>>>>> On 28-10-2009, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> a.{i} <- x for each.
>>>
>>> I think I will implement your method and C stubs for every set/get and
>>> compare.
>>
>> This is only the case with int64 array in fact (I really have done test
>> and you don't need a C call in most case).
>
> Can I assume you tested on a 32bit cpu?
>

Yes. There is probably even less case on 64bits CPU.

Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall