From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BF6BC57 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:09:32 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsQEABOj00tQW+UMmWdsb2JhbACQMot0DhUBAQEBAQgLCgcRIrtLhQwEhiQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,269,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="49108659" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2010 11:09:32 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5xqE-0003lZ-U3 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:09:30 +0200 Received: from ks300734.kimsufi.com ([91.121.65.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:09:30 +0200 Received: from sylvain by ks300734.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:09:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr connect(): No such file or directory From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: SHA1 => stdlib ?! Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20100424142747.18553coxijfxshc3@webmail.in-berlin.de> <20100424162844.37911eihdab7zsws@webmail.in-berlin.de> <4BD30857.30504@grant-olson.net> <20100424171143.119877hl2l4ov9kf@webmail.in-berlin.de> <20100425085846.GA8036@snarc.org> X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks300734.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-11 (Linux) X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 stdlib:01 ocaml:01 bindings:01 computes:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 cryptokit:01 cryptokit:01 argument:02 argument:02 strong:96 perhaps:05 apr:06 vincent:07 On 25-04-2010, Vincent Hanquez wrote: > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 03:29:08PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: >> Cryptokit is written by X. Leroy, the same author as OCaml. > > what about technical arguments/reasons instead of fanboyism ? > cryptokit has lots of good things, and some reason to choose them over my > ocaml-sha bindings, but i find the argument you just made pretty distasteful. > This is pure information, no fanboyism intended. Concerning technical arguments/reasons, I think a simple "it computes SHA1" is the only argument I can give and it was implied in my answer ;-) Perhaps, it is also because I use it. Regards, Sylvain Le Gall ps: distasteful is a bit strong especially because you took an information for an argument.