From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2608EBC57 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:28:18 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AncDAHpd7UtQW+UMgWdsb2JhbACeBhUBARYiIr1LhRAEhjc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,233,1272837600"; d="scan'208";a="51186649" Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 May 2010 23:28:17 +0200 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OD2QY-0003RU-Cy for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:28:14 +0200 Received: from ks368928.kimsufi.com ([94.23.39.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:28:14 +0200 Received: from sylvain by ks368928.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 23:28:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr connect(): No such file or directory From: Sylvain Le Gall Subject: Re: about OcamIL Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 21:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <201005061233.07551.peng.zang@gmail.com> <07b101caf08b$3e5022c0$baf06840$@com> <088201caf1ce$b5060cb0$1f122610$@com> <20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net> <012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com> <87fx1uh5r5.fsf@frosties.localdomain> <0E1811BF-59F6-4531-8A65-67B60A4F345D@gmail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks368928.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-11 (Linux) X-Spam: no; 0.00; le-gall:01 ocaml:01 landing:98 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 wrote:01 precisely:01 applied:05 reasoning:07 licensing:08 business:90 source:12 license:12 companies:87 isn't:13 On 14-05-2010, ben kuin wrote: >> Isn't this precisely the aim of Jon's hlvm >> (www.ffconsultancy.com/ocaml/hlvm/)? > > > licensing: > Hlvm is driven by a company and its landing page is on a companies > website and one of its protagonists is smart *and* business savvy. > What if hlvm would really take off, could they set it free and move > the homepage to sourceforge ? Last time, I checked hlvm homepage was here: http://hlvm.forge.ocamlcore.org What difference will it make to set it on sourceforge? The reasoning you apply to a possible change of license can be applied to a lot of thing in Open Source World... Regards, Sylvain Le Gall