From: Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:38:09 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnie7fl1.r67.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CE395D4.4000105@frisch.fr>
On 17-11-2010, Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr> wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 03:52 PM, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
>> OCamlJit 2.0 was specifically designed for desktop processors and is
>> not really portable to anything else in its current shape, because
>> the target audience are people using the interactive top-level and
>> the byte-code interpreter for rapid prototyping/development
>
> This looks like a very interesting project!
>
> Does performance really matter that much for rapid
> prototyping/development? I can imagine other uses of the toplevel where
> performance matters more, like theorem provers embedded in the OCaml
> toplevel.
>
OASIS generates a setup.ml that is interpreted using the toplevel.
Maybe, a native toplevel can enhance the speed of this process (it takes
less than 1 second to run).
http://oasis.forge.ocamlcore.org
Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 14:52 OCamlJit 2.0 Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-16 17:07 ` [Caml-list] " bluestorm
2010-11-16 17:32 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-17 8:44 ` Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0) Alain Frisch
2010-11-17 10:46 ` Satoshi Ogasawara
2010-11-17 11:38 ` Sylvain Le Gall [this message]
2010-11-17 22:57 ` [Caml-list] Native toplevel? Wojciech Daniel Meyer
2010-11-18 16:49 ` [Caml-list] Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0) Ashish Agarwal
2010-11-19 18:09 ` David MENTRE
2010-11-19 18:24 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
2010-11-19 18:30 ` Ashish Agarwal
2010-11-19 18:42 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-20 11:49 ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-18 18:19 ` Benedikt Meurer
[not found] ` <2025993285.616104.1290144569061.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
2010-11-19 10:02 ` [Caml-list] Re: Native toplevel? Fabrice Le Fessant
2010-11-19 19:16 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-19 18:43 ` [Caml-list] OCamlJit 2.0 Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-19 19:10 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-20 15:59 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-19 19:46 ` Dario Teixeira
2010-11-19 20:20 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-20 15:19 ` [Was: OCamlJit 2.0] Vincent Balat
2010-11-20 15:42 ` [Caml-list] " Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-20 16:10 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-20 16:25 ` Benedikt Meurer
2010-11-20 17:35 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-20 17:08 ` Jon Harrop
2010-11-20 17:37 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-20 17:48 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2010-11-20 18:51 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2010-11-20 18:05 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2010-11-20 17:15 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2010-11-23 2:09 ` Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva
2010-11-24 7:20 ` [Caml-list] OCamlJit 2.0 Alain Frisch
2010-11-24 7:59 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-11-24 9:04 ` Compiling to Javascript Jerome Vouillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=slrnie7fl1.r67.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org \
--to=sylvain@le-gall.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).