From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430B97EDC3 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:01:51 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of sylvain@le-gall.net) identity=pra; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="sylvain@le-gall.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@plane.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="postmaster@plane.gmane.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApQEABGbq1BQW+UDgWdsb2JhbABFi3SkIIQyAY4SFg4BARYmJ4IeAQEFJy4ZGwsYDQ8SECwJEhAJEoV+gWsDARIHsAGGdAOFRYQZjDWBToMnA5JNAxCDHoEckhSBZA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,286,1352070000"; d="scan'208";a="182357856" Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 20 Nov 2012 16:01:50 +0100 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TapKn-0002aF-5R for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:01:57 +0100 Received: from ks399241.kimsufi.com ([37.59.37.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:01:57 +0100 Received: from sylvain by ks399241.kimsufi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:01:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Sylvain Le Gall Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ks399241.kimsufi.com User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Poll results of OASIS, package manager and misc. I made an error when sharing this link. It requires to ack access to every one (although the doc is public). Please use this link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnHn-aw3eaotdE1jM1JSTGdHVV8wTWZxenV4cEkwVlE and Go to the menu Form -> Show summarry of responses. I will display it on http://oasis.forge.ocamlcore.org when I will have time. Regards Sylvain On 20-11-2012, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > > --14dae934082734eefe04ceea348e > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hello, > > You can see the result here: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/gform?key=0AnHn-aw3eaotdE1jM1JSTGdHVV8wTWZxenV4cEkwVlE&gridId=0#chart > > The outcome for package manager is pretty obvious, oasis-db should focus on > OPAM as a package manager. This is now on my todo list, > > Concerning build system: > - ocamlbuild is first (60%) > - native Makefile is second (40%) > > So I'll probably focus on this two build systems, which represents at least > 70% of what people need (the 3rd build system is less than 30%). > > Cheers > Sylvain Le Gall > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > --14dae934082734eefe04ceea348e > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hello,

You can see the result here:

The outcome for package manager is pretty obvious= > , oasis-db should focus on OPAM as a package manager. This is now on my tod= > o list,

Concerning build system:
- ocaml= > build is first (60%)
>
- native Makefile is second (40%)

So I'll= > probably focus on this two build systems, which represents at least 70% of= > what people need (the 3rd build system is less than 30%).

>
Cheers
Sylvain Le Gall
> > --14dae934082734eefe04ceea348e-- > Cheers, Sylvain Le Gall -- My company: http://www.ocamlcore.com Linkedin: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/sylvainlegall Start an OCaml project here: http://forge.ocamlcore.org OCaml blogs: http://planet.ocamlcore.org