From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889717F256 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:26:31 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,730,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="180549003" Received: from sympa.inria.fr ([193.51.193.213]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2012 17:26:31 +0100 Received: by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 20132) id 79CEC7F257; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:26:31 +0100 (CET) To: caml-list@inria.fr,gabriel.scherer@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT From: X-Mailer: Sympa 6.1.7 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 17:26:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Re: [Caml-list] C binding with labelled arguments Hi Gabriel, I agree it'd be better to use labelled arguments than not, for safety as you suggest. I was just wondering if there was a way to add labelled arguments directly to the external, rather than requiring a wrapper function to add the labels. John