Let’s be civil. Note that I did not write a single line of reason, but I understand it’s intention to use a more familiar function application syntax and it seems to be appreciated by quite a few people. There are issues though, the parens are overloaded in too many context, if it uses ‘[‘ for tuple like what typescript did, then such ambiguity would be removed 发自我的iPhone ------------------ Original ------------------ From: Evgeny Khramtsov Date: 周一,12月 11,2017 3:12 下午 To: caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ReasonML concrete syntax Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:50:02 +0100 Sven SAULEAU wrote: > The reason behind that move (from Reasonml version 2 to 3), is that > it feels more natural to JavaScript developers. If you develop software for idiots, only idiots will use it (c) Come on, if you cannot learn a new syntax, you're an idiot. No exceptions. -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs