From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA4ABBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon,  5 Apr 2010 17:41:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjECAGqhuUtKfU4YkGdsb2JhbACDEZgwCBUBAQEBCQkMBxEDH6YugiaEE4h5AQEDBYEmgm5uBIxC
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,366,1267398000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="60227694"
Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2010 17:41:51 +0200
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so243807eyf.31
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=Nms+kbmLuHSEDVcVvQ64cFHcL6DmpAg/onwPhwx498c=;
        b=jIhzlEWCGtibb6O76SRdqZJOk3Ag7GPpP4cALcCPT5Zx54D03ecqH31PoWys3aUYxP
         UAtFXKbhNxkrfv/s08KMZsouq6hN2DK7P752H8fEtYiAfaNepUZdEo6qWjRPoE38FBe/
         BdB8lZhmPdtd3uV+VMaXib3YpsBZVfn3SlEMo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=SSXmqLwkxYFPPXpaVdISYIPjZIIgyfZYir875acyznCbHh7JoQawZMvDDpfjPX5Lt4
         y5pe51ZIKMIhS1i0Oz5Fe2JGfAoWoNlkP6TS+Mum8bJBd9xnzXNUImTZPhpACOg0TNaa
         wTJmHmyT6HFzlcYFyWKKFUZtyZlJlqPCquadg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.213.13.11 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <892901.19224.qm@web111502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <892901.19224.qm@web111502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:41:49 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3085a0aaece1249b
Received: by 10.213.39.196 with SMTP id h4mr1479452ebe.97.1270482109189; Mon, 
	05 Apr 2010 08:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <w2r91a3da521004050841q61f57327vc1c6b0030e5f3201@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Forced linking and Ocamlbuild
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam: no; 0.00; buenzli:01 unclean:01 ocamldoc:01 dependencies:01 caml-list:01 dependency:01 output:02 linking:02 daniel:04 daniel:04 i'm:09 cleaner:09 suppose:09 file:11 dummy:12 

> (I realise there's always the option of adding a
> dummy reference, but I'm looking for a cleaner solution).

Is it really "unclean" ?

Suppose you'd like to use ocamldoc to output a dot file to understand
the dependencies of your program, if you manage to achieve what you
want to do you'll miss that dependency.

The more info there is in the source (vs. the build procedure) the
easier it is to understand the program.

Best,

Daniel