From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D710BC6B for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:03:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server2.thinkcrime.de (server2.thinkcrime.de [213.133.110.149]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l6BB3Va9024472 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:03:32 +0200 Received: from hod-sarge-2005-10.lan.m-e-leypold.de (dslb-088-072-196-085.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.72.196.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server2.thinkcrime.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65556488016 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:03:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hod-sarge-2005-10.lan.m-e-leypold.de (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 70D0437706; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:54:20 +0200 (CEST) To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4..camlp5 References: <20070709094028.GB9408@yquem.inria.fr> <20070710113259.GA16672@takhisis.invalid> <20070710121954.GB7621@yquem.inria.fr> <20070710123322.GA20239@takhisis.invalid> <20070710150412.GA23767@yquem.inria.fr> <20070710150811.GA470@takhisis.invalid> <54fy3v7ujj.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <20070710233027.GA27920@yquem.inria.fr> <20070711064530.GA30407@takhisis.invalid> Organization: Leypold, Software-Dienstleistungen und -Beratung From: "Markus E.L." Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:54:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070711064530.GA30407@takhisis.invalid> (Stefano Zacchiroli's message of "Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:45:30 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4694B903.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 camlp:01 markus:01 0200,:01 rauglaudre:01 markus:01 wrote:01 clearer:01 caml-list:01 argument:02 agrees:02 seems:03 debian:04 daniel:04 jul:04 > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:30:28AM +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote: >> Since I can make my releases independantly and fastly, I am ready to >> change my camlp4 into camlp5, if everybody agrees, even if I have to >> make also a release of all my sofwares, but it is not a big deal, and >> things would be probably clearer like that. > > Well, I think the -name argument is already a useful step. I just asked > for a suggested name to avoid a plethora of unknown different names. In > Debian, JFYI, I went for "camlp5" as it seems to me it's a name you like > and that it's welcome by the community. Obviously you all didn't get the camlp4/camlp5 pun :-(. Regards -- Markus