From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA18795; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:05:23 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA19000 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:05:22 +0200 (MET DST) From: l@toril.ru Received: from m-10.ru (barbero-1.m-10.ru [217.106.225.133]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6RA5LSH018255 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:05:21 +0200 Received: from [81.1.200.134] (account l@toril.ru) by m-10.ru (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8) with HTTP id 13910078 for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:05:15 +0400 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] LLVM and O'Caml To: caml-list@inria.fr X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:05:15 +0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 410628E1.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 2004:99 compiler:01 patch:02 o'caml:02 o'caml:02 wrote:03 jul:06 core:06 developers:08 tue:09 think:11 U4:88 0400:19 could:20 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:15:38 +0400 l@toril.ru wrote: What does O'Caml developers think about ocamlllvm compiler in core distributive? Could you accept such patch? WBR, Evgeny. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners