From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Sympa-To: caml-list@inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBAIYtRj022481
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:34:56 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsAAAPml405KfVI0imdsb2JhbABDhDdQpW4IIgEBAQoJDQcSBiGBcgEBAQMBDAYCDx0BATcBBAsJAgsPAgUhAgIPAQQgAQUBIhMUDodmApggCoozaYMzAY1VB4E0iSOBFpR1jXE9g3k
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,332,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="122861525"
Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 10 Dec 2011 19:34:36 +0100
Received: by wgbdr12 with SMTP id dr12so9724798wgb.9
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:34:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
         :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ATlaJx/oE7DPirQcW1GdVma3Uk4WPYlmrsffss9Kt08=;
        b=QR1oagQyRG9O198aszBn6TfuCBgpLqennyK8U/8kCvvny/LAeMB2FDU2si/56RMkzO
         KPmTeUrc976pMTaS6OMamEVBDwLepDSgjAY9/m24ZgWHuJeo1pFY6I8pE1DZwgQZLVZ5
         Q6hKz6L1qKUDo3f90nhKBUNsIoW80QQAWw1KU=
Received: by 10.227.206.6 with SMTP id fs6mr9975375wbb.20.1323542076441;
        Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spec-desktop.danmey.org (cpc1-cmbg12-0-0-cust201.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com. [86.9.116.202])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bs13sm18391767wib.21.2011.12.10.10.34.34
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:34:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Wojciech Meyer <wojciech.meyer@googlemail.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsOpbWll?= Dimino <jeremie@dimino.org>
Cc: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
References: <55531934-37A5-4CC5-AB67-20CE4CCE8269@googlemail.com>
	<4EE37070.4010702@inria.fr> <1323541702.32136.8.camel@aurora>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:34:23 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1323541702.32136.8.camel@aurora> (=?utf-8?B?IkrDqXLDqW1pZQ==?=
 Dimino"'s message of
	"Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:28:22 +0100")
Message-ID: <wfhb18wa1c.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id pBAIYtRj022481
X-Validation-by: wojciech.meyer@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml maintenance status / community fork (again)

Hi,

Jérémie Dimino <jeremie@dimino.org> writes:

> But there is something i don't understand here. Why is there camlp4 and
> camlp5 ? These two projects do exactly the same thing and are
> incompatible. So i don't see the point of maintaining them both. We
> should at least deprecate one.

BTW: Are there any plans to add type reflection to Camlp4 (or Camlp5)?

>
> Cheers,
>
> -- 
> Jérémie

Cheers;
Wojciech