From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B19BC69 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:28:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smeltpunt.science.ru.nl (smeltpunt.science.ru.nl [131.174.16.145]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2Q7RxvK018364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:28:00 +0200 Received: from tandem.cs.ru.nl [131.174.142.18] (helo=tandem.cs.ru.nl) by smeltpunt.science.ru.nl (8.13.7/5.11) with ESMTP id l2Q7Rx44016438 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:27:59 +0200 (MEST) Received: from tews by tandem.cs.ru.nl with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HVjcV-0000y8-Nk for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:27:59 +0200 From: Hendrik Tews To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 3.10.0+beta: lists without $list:...$ References: Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:27:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Nicolas Pouillard's message of "Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:21:48 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 131.174.16.145 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46077600.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; hendrik:01 tews:01 tews:01 camlp:01 camlp:01 ocaml:01 wiki:01 syntax:01 wiki:01 hendrik:01 tu-dresden:01 caml-list:01 writes:01 grammar:01 revised:02 "Nicolas Pouillard" writes: Perhaps there is a need for some consulting services on camlp4 :) No, we just need documentation! How about annotating an ocaml grammar with all possible quotations/antiquotations? Similar to http://wwwtcs.inf.tu-dresden.de/~tews/ocamlp4/qo_doc.html ? Couldn't we just start a wiki for that? I mean dump the rules of the revised syntax into a wiki and then everybody who discovers a working quotation or antiquotation can just insert it there? Bye, Hendrik