From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2194BBC0B for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:07:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from smeltpunt.science.ru.nl (smeltpunt.science.ru.nl [131.174.16.145]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kB497Ua6028055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:07:30 +0100 Received: from tandem.cs.ru.nl [131.174.142.18] (helo=tandem.cs.ru.nl) by smeltpunt.science.ru.nl (8.13.7/5.10) with ESMTP id kB497TDQ001630 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:07:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from tews by tandem.cs.ru.nl with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gr9nN-0004dM-SD for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:07:29 +0100 From: Hendrik Tews To: Ocaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Memory cost of a compaction References: <53c655920612020734q4272cb9em5311c3ec3ea14ab2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:07:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <53c655920612020734q4272cb9em5311c3ec3ea14ab2@mail.gmail.com> (David Baelde's message of "Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:34:04 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 131.174.16.145 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4573E552.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; hendrik:01 tews:01 tews:01 compaction:01 compaction:01 verbose:01 hendrik:01 010:98 caml-list:01 triggered:05 memory:08 i'm:09 wondering:09 compact:09 but:14 But I'm now wondering if after 10 hours a compaction could be triggered because of fragmentation. I believe that a compaction would Have you tried logging GC compatations: { (GC.get()) with GC.verbose <- 0x010 } Or triggeringg compactations yourself GC.compact? Bye, Hendrik