From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD13BC69 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 10:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smeltpunt.science.ru.nl (smeltpunt.science.ru.nl [131.174.16.145]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4283vL7004801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 10:03:57 +0200 Received: from tandem.cs.ru.nl [131.174.142.18] (helo=tandem.cs.ru.nl) by smeltpunt.science.ru.nl (8.13.7/5.11) with ESMTP id l4283uAZ012577 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 10:03:56 +0200 (MEST) Received: from tews by tandem.cs.ru.nl with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hj9ob-0000TJ-D3 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Wed, 02 May 2007 10:03:57 +0200 From: Hendrik Tews To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: new+old Camlp4 References: <001401c785f3$3af5e890$6a7ba8c0@treble> <1177392571.10100.46.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070424122338.ozkvhzfhckcskkc4@webmail.etu.upmc.fr> <1177439118.6172.18.camel@rosella.wigram> <4631BF33.6080407@inria.fr> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 10:03:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4631BF33.6080407@inria.fr> (Xavier Leroy's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:15:31 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 131.174.16.145 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 463845ED.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; hendrik:01 tews:01 tews:01 camlp:01 camlp:01 hendrik:01 caml-list:01 writes:01 xavier:06 xavier:06 inria:06 leroy:07 leroy:07 releasing:08 door:91 Xavier Leroy writes: Releasing both old and new Camlp4 as part of 3.10 is out of the question, however. That would only delay the inevitable and would waste a lot of our time to make such a release. The priorities are 1- get 3.10.0 out of the door, and 2- of course, provide more documentation on the new Camlp4. I believe you got the priorities wrong here. Documentation should be finished before the release. Bye, Hendrik