From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11E87820A1 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:54:53 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of lpw25@cam.ac.uk) identity=pra; client-ip=131.111.8.152; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lpw25@cam.ac.uk"; x-sender="lpw25@cam.ac.uk"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of lpw25@cam.ac.uk) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=131.111.8.152; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lpw25@cam.ac.uk"; x-sender="lpw25@cam.ac.uk"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk) identity=helo; client-ip=131.111.8.152; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lpw25@cam.ac.uk"; x-sender="postmaster@ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsEBAAVnMFKDbwiYnGdsb2JhbABbgz/DMoEcFg4BAQEBAQgLCQkUKIImAQU6PxALISUPAQRciAIMvBmIOY9qBxaEBwOZKJNm X-IPAS-Result: AsEBAAVnMFKDbwiYnGdsb2JhbABbgz/DMoEcFg4BAQEBAQgLCQkUKIImAQU6PxALISUPAQRciAIMvBmIOY9qBxaEBwOZKJNm X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,884,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="26486195" Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.152]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2013 14:54:52 +0200 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from kingston.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.64.15]:35386) by ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:lpw25) (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1VJjwZ-0006Vg-Fz (Exim 4.80_167-5a66dd3) (return-path ); Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:54:51 +0100 From: Leo White To: rixed@happyleptic.org Cc: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me> <522FC0C2.8080600@riken.jp> <20130911050753.GA22288@dell.happyleptic.org> <20130911102616.01772b9d@atmarama.noip.me> <20130911092310.GA28849@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> X-Face: "XWxb[u_Z\PA_Y?9@|IA!!+jTb(/290-*ea/Un$I0B98.$n%eL.;2w*,z]WR#T:,p[ NBd++M7l]#7zj7!{~iw $W-"/=|dVjhT[D{4~gE}gK<2`.6fs!;uqqud]vs2N/3^m7{aS1V, Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:54:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130911092310.GA28849@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> (rixed@happyleptic.org's message of "Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:23:10 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options rixed@happyleptic.org writes: > -[ Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:26:16AM +0200, Gour ]---- >> On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:07:53 +0200 >> I'm also curious what would hypothetical qt-server bring to OCaml users? > > I used Qt a long time ago, and all I remember is the complex build system > with custom preprocessors pilled on top of C++. No wonder there is not > many bindings to Qt. > > Something like Qt-server, ie. a C++ program linked with Qt, controlled by > stdin and obeying widget-related commands, would brings Qt bindings to many > other languages. I was unaware that what made gtk-server easy to write > was how easy it is to dynamically lookup function names. Perhaps Smoke (http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Languages/Smoke) is similar. Regards, Leo